Prediction of Matea Curic vs Malou Ejdesgaard Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Curic vs M. Ejdesgaard

Matea Curic

CRO

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Malou Ejdesgaard

DEN

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Curic 1 - 0 Ejdesgaard

They have played 2 sets in total, with Matea Curic winning 2 and Malou Ejdesgaard winning 0. The last match between Matea Curic and Malou Ejdesgaard was at the Osijek, 29-08-2011, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Matea Curic getting the victory 6-2 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Curic	1
Ejdesgaard	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) Osijek(08-29-11)

Stats

Matea Curic

Malou Ejdesgaard

M. Curic vs M. Ejdesgaard H2H Profile

M. Curic	Stats	M. Ejdesgaard
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
53.85% (14-12)	Career Total W/L	33.62% (39-77)
1	Clay	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. Curic vs M. Ejdesgaard Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Matea Curic has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Malou Ejdesgaard has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Matea Curic, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Malou Ejdesgaard has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Matea Curic has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Malou Ejdesgaard has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Matea Curic has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Malou Ejdesgaard winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Matea Curic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 14/11), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 14/11). Malou Ejdesgaard has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 1/1), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 22% (W/L 4/14).
Player level: In the last year, Matea Curic has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Malou Ejdesgaard has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Matea Curic winning 1 times and Malou Ejdesgaard being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Matea Curic winning 2 and Malou Ejdesgaard winning 0.
The last match between Matea Curic and Malou Ejdesgaard was at the Osijek, 29-08-2011, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Matea Curic getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Matea Curic has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Malou Ejdesgaard has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Matea Curic has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Malou Ejdesgaard has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Matea Curic has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Malou Ejdesgaard has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Matea Curic vs Malou Ejdesgaard Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Curic vs M. Ejdesgaard H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. Curic	Stats	M. Ejdesgaard
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	5
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

M. Curic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Dubrovnik - 17-10-2011
R1 Tena LukasT. Lukas	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
Bol - 10-10-2011
QF Morgane PonsM. Pons	W	7-6(3) 6-1	Stats
R1 Larisa SporeaL. Sporea	W	6-4 6-2	Stats
Q2 Ksenia GospodinovaK. Gospodinova	W	6-3 6-2	Stats
SF Karla PopovicK. Popovic	L	6-3 6-2	Stats

View All

M. Ejdesgaard Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Copenhagen - 28-07-2014
Q1 Viktoria BjorkV. Bjork	L	6-3 6-1	Stats
Marathon - Athens - 07-10-2013
Q2 Charlotte Van Der MeijC. Van	L	w/o	Stats
Marathon - Athens - 30-09-2013
Q1 Giada ClericiG. Clerici	L	4-6 ret.	Stats
Marathon - Athens - 23-09-2013
Q3 Sandy MartiS. Marti	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
Q1 Nelli PonomarevaN. Ponomareva	W	3-6 6-1 6-4	Stats

View All

M. Curic vs M. Ejdesgaard Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. Curic	Stats	M. Ejdesgaard
53.85% (14/12)	YTD Win/Loss	33.62% (39/77)
55.17% (32/26)	Sets Win/Loss	38.91% (100/157)
51.17% (262/250)	Games Win/Loss	45.28% (1026/1240)
0% (0/0)	Hard Win/Loss	41.18% (28/40)
56.00% (14/11)	Clay Win/Loss	26.09% (6/17)
0.00% (0/1)	Indoor Hard W/L	17.39% (4/19)
0% (0/0)	Grass Win/Loss	50.00% (1/1)
0	Double Faults Per Game	0.02
0	Total Double Faults	22
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
358.65	Average Opponent Rank	469.22
0% (0/0)	1st Serve %	59% (160/269)
0% (0/0)	1st Serve Win %	44% (70/160)
0% (0/0)	2nd Serve Win %	39% (42/109)
0% (0/0)	Break Points Won % (Total)	53% (8/15)
0% (0/0)	Return Points Win %	35% (86/247)
0% (0/0)	Cups W/L	0.00% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	Main Tour W/L	0.00% (0/7)
0.00% (0/1)	Challenger W/L	27.03% (10/27)
56.00% (14/11)	Futures W/L	40.85% (29/42)
54% (14/26)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	34% (37/109)
75% (3/4)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	47% (9/19)
33% (2/6)	Deciding Set Win %	32% (10/31)
75% (16/12)	1st Set Won, Won Match	74% (46/34)
25% (16/4)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	24% (46/11)
20% (10/2)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	10% (70/7)